automobile.com 5pts I'm sorry to hear the 240Z Nissan provided wasn't properly tuned. The SU style carburetors are a incredibly smooth when properly cared for and tuned.I wanted to clear up a few minor issues. First is that Nissan/Datsun never offered an OEM front or rear spoiler on the 1970-1978 model year Z cars. The aerodynamics got much better with the release of the 280ZX but remained unchained through the 1978 model. Any add-ons were aftermarket or dealer added.Also, there is great controversy over Goertz's attribution to the Z car design. Carl Beck, widely respected Z car historian has made this statement: http://zcar.wikia.com/wiki/2000GTAnd for what it's worth, I'd much rather own this: http://grassrootsmotorsports.com/reader-rides/538/ than the FRS/BRZ... at least until they release a model with a factory turbo option! ;)
DMR 5pts I owned a 73 240Z for 8 years back in the 80's, and I loved that bright "red" car. It was actually Chinese red or orange to most. Once I swapped those crappy 73' SU knock off carb's for a couple of 72' models nothing could compare. I've owned 3 series BMW's, A4 Audi's Mazda RX 7's, and SC Lexus's, but that little Z has always been the standard bearer. The 2003 BMW 325 was a hellava car for a sedan, however.I'm now considering a Scion FR-S. If you haven't figured it out by now, I'm in my late 50's. At my age, you certainly don't want to appear to be chasing youth, but I've always loved sports cars. With that being said I'm considering, heaven forbid, an auto tranny. I'd love nothing more than to get a 6-speed, but there will be time that I'll need to drive my wife's 328. She doesn't drive a manual, and she is not going to learn. After 30+ years of marriage, you learn how far to push it. Thankfully, the guys who developed the FR-S are real gear heads, and the auto trans is supposed to be a pretty tricked out unit. If anyone is out there who has gotten one of these little beauties, and is living with it day to day, could post how the FR-S is to live with in the real world, that would be a great help. Dave
Chris Hebert 5pts Nice article, I wish that there were more such then-and-now comparisons. One correction to the 240Z specs, however. The brakes are vacuum assisted, not manual. Mr. Lopez's suggestions may be a bit much for a stock-to-stock comparison, but given that the factory tires had worn out before the Scion nameplate was even a twinkle in Toyota's eye, replacing the stock size with a good set in the 205 -- 215 / 60 range would be appropriate and, I think, eye-opening.
Carlos Lopez 5pts Love this article. Both these cars represent the same market in their own times and do the same thing. The thing is you compared the 240z in complete stock form to an obviously stock FR-S. That is fine, but the early 240z has some much needed upgrades that improve the driving experience tremendously. The 4-speed to be swapped with a 5-speed. The Differential to be swapped for an R200. With those "subtle" upgrades the car accelerates much better in today's world. More of its 130ish HP will be accessible. Then again who cares? If you can drive any of these cars life is great.