Four Threes: 2013 Infiniti JX35, 2012 BMW X5, 2013 Lincoln MKT, 2012 Acura MDX

Nathan Leach-Proffer
luxury-suvs

Interior: Luxuriously Quiet, Quietly Luxurious

Having tested our luxury crossovers' ability to get our hearts pounding, we looked at how they keep us comfortable and entertained.

The X5 is the most expensive car of the bunch and its interior materials are obviously of high quality, but there's little visual flair. Some of the blame goes to our particular color combination -- brown wood over an inky, graphite-colored leather -- but the available sand and creamy brown leather colors can only go so far to dress up the bland interior. At least the seats are comfortable and the controls are straightforward.

The MDX's interior is somewhat better. Our tester had both the Advance and Entertainment packages, which meant the center stack was littered in buttons for the front and rear entertainment systems, navigation, and automatic climate control. On either side of the controls, there are two sweeping swaths of wood trim, which add just enough visual drama to keep the interior from being boring.

The MKT's interior surprised us with its materials quality, including gorgeous hazelnut-colored leather, brown wood, and a deep gray center stack. The MyLincoln Touch system may be unloved for how it works, but its visual simplicity (i.e. lack of knobs and buttons) is a stark contrast to the MDX. The windows and panoramic glass roof let in plenty of light, and the glass is well-laminated to keep wind noise to a minimum.

The clear winner is the JX, because Infiniti's designers made an interior that was functional and beautiful. The car's distinctive exterior design continues on the inside with interestingly shaped door handles and trim strips, and an organic, double-bubble dashboard. Our only gripe was the steering wheel, which was obviously of a lower grade than other Infinitis.

Winner: Infiniti JX

Curb Appeal: Looks Expensive, Is Expensive

A luxury crossover that costs $10,000 more than a Buick Enclave must also look better than a Buick Enclave, and must come with more brand-name cachet. With that gauntlet set, our cars had mixed results.

The Lincoln MKT's design hearkens back to the brand's halcyon days before World War II, with low sills, a high roofline, and a bustle-back reminiscent of 1940's Lincoln limousines. Noble as designer Peter Horbury's quest may have been, the challenge of fitting 1940s design within a 1990s sedan footprint (it's based on an old Volvo platform) and adding 21st-century functionality proved too much. The front end is low, which is a good start, but the rear doors and windows look overly stretched, and the original MKT Concept's curves and creases have been flattened. The liftgate is a wide, nearly flat sheet of metal topped by a plasticky light bar and a small, rectangular rear window. The MKT is a valiant attempt at reinventing an icon, but it's ultimately let down by its baroque styling.

If the MKT was styled to make a statement, the MDX was styled to speak softly. The car is chiseled and neatly creased, but flared wheel arches add a nice curvy touch. Even Acura's unloved "razor grille" blends well into the MDX's front end and its geometric headlights. We especially like how the triangular rear window gives this three-row SUV a two-row crossover's greenhouse.

The Infiniti JX has a boldly shaped body with a long, curving character line and Infiniti's new hourglass grille. Too bad that your eyes are drawn to its low door handles, stretched rear door, and rear windows, which make the JX look a little bit like a minivan.

Even without flashy chrome trim or dazzling wheels, the BMW makes a bold statement on the road. Its wheel arches bulge out from the side panels and the hood creases to hint at the powerful engine underneath. Unlike the Infiniti, the X5's door handles are located on the character line, which maintains a crisp look, and the rear end is folded and creased to keep the liftgate from becoming a flat sheet of metal, like the MKT's. It looks expensive -- and it is.

Winner: BMW X5

Teerexness
The Lincoln MKT is by far the best of this group. Powerhouse engine that still gets good mileage, excellent handling while still soaking up increasingly degraded urban road surfaces, unbelievable long distance comfort and lots of technology that actually works. In spite of the often mentioned (by the reviewer) styling issues, it looks better to my eyes than the forced, superfluous origami styling of the Japanese entries and the dated estate on stilts look of the BMW X5. Drive all 4 on the same day. You'll choose the MKT.
Flyman615
The Lincoln MKT with 3.5 Ecoboost wins hands down. Best engine and best interior without a doubt. The Technology and Elite packages are well worth the money and all you really need. Traded in my 2010 SHO to get the same drivetrain with a bit more luxury. Saw a 1939 Lincoln on my way to the dealer to sign the deal. Similar grill...a great omen! I've tried other crossovers including an A6 Audi, BMW X5 and VW 4 motion. The MKT is a FAR better and more versatile vehicle.
PadreDave
So, let me get this straight: The Mazda CX-9, Buick and Ford were left out because their "nameplate"is too pedestrian, or perhaps pediatric because we love children.I am not a betting man, but I would wager my CX-9 GT would hold her own amongs these inflated nameplates.And, as "dgordon "right below me saiy, that MB is one nice car, but not a 7 seater.. Is that Audi a 7 seater? Hmmmm.... I'm just saying.....
dgordon
I have a 2006 SLK 350 6 speed stick which is the most fun car I have ever had and very reliable.I think it is one of the prettiest cars on the road, nicer than the SL and SLS amg.It's nose is gorgeous, not a phallic addon.Beauty is in the eye of the beholder
jmrzx
Where's the Audi Q7? Lexus GX?

buyer's guide

Find vehicle reviews, photos, & pricing

our instagram

get Automobile Magazine

Subscribe to the magazine and save up to 84% off the newsstand price

subscribe

new cars

Read Related Articles

TO TOP