Comparison: BMW Z4 sDrive35is vs. Mercedes-Benz SLK350

Matt Tierney
#BMW, #Z4

Toe-to-toe at last
We've been waiting a long time for this meeting. The predecessors to the two cars you see here debuted back in the booming late 1990s, but were as different as Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton, or Friends and Seinfeld. The bulldog-faced Z3 oozed machismo, performance, and back-to-basics simplicity. James Bond drove one. The SLK, in contrast, had a steel folding hard top, came in colors like copper and electric green, and had recirculating-ball steering. Your wife wanted one.

It's a lot more complicated these days. Everyone knows Newt's a philanderer, too, and no one knows what's on NBC Thursday nights. More to the point, with the two-seat convertible segment shriveling to a size that can no longer support multiple niches, BMW and Mercedes have moved away from their extremes and have, in the process, created very similar roadsters. In the Z3's transformation to the Z4 and now the second-generation Z4, it aped the SLK's luxurious appointments and its folding hardtop. Mercedes, meanwhile, has quietly injected testosterone into its "chick car" such that the new SLK350, which went on sale earlier this month, puts down 302 hp and carves corners like an honest-to-goodness sports car. Call it evolution; call it regression to the mean; call it business. We'd call it the makings of a great showdown.

Uniqueness counts. Or does it?
A comparison of lesser hardtop convertibles would no doubt spend much time talking about which did a better job disguising the frumpy rear quarters. This, however, is the master class, and there's no trace of awkwardness in either our diamond white metallic SLK350 or Melbourne red metallic Z4 sDrive35is. Instead, we can consider the SLK and Z4 on the merits of their overall design.

Much like buying the cheapest house in a ritzy neighborhood, the SLK clearly benefits aesthetically from having very expensive older siblings. The roofline whispers "SL550" and the upright front end barks "SLS AMG." And yet unlike the last model's drooping SLR McLaren nose, the cues on the new SLK don't seem tacked on in a vain effort to convince dates that you're a movie star rather than an orthodontist. It's convincing, mature, and masculine without being butch.

1 of 4
MeDotOrg
Neither of these cars seems to live up to their potential. They both seem overpriced for what you get.
JagBro9
Intereting that no cars intended for the home market, either BMW or Mercedes, have cup holders. For all I know, ours is the only country's market that would seem to require one. So if the Z4's cup holder looks tacked on, I'm not surprised.
ahem
"We still think BMW's insistence that each paddle should be able to call up either upshifts or downshifts (tap forward for upshift, pull back for upshift) is confusing." Now this is confusing...either action (tap forward or pull back) gets the same result?
nknorka
Weren't these $45,000 ten years ago? They may have similar names, but they are in a completely different class than the Z3 or original SLK.Miatas get better and everyone else just gets more expensive.
johncarync
Looking at the pictures, the thing that stands out to me is that horrible, tacked-on cup holder in the Z4. It's clearly an American-market afterthought. Give me 30 minutes and I could design something better.

New Car Research

Find reviews, photos & pricing for:

Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class

BMW Z4

our instagram

get Automobile Magazine

Subscribe to the magazine and save up to 84% off the newsstand price

subscribe

new cars

Read Related Articles

TO TOP