Comparison: 2011 Ford Explorer vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee

Brian Konoske

When we dropped down out of the hills, we found ourselves on the flat floor of the California desert. Route 78 dips south of the Salton Sea and then turns north through irrigated fields, becoming a long, straight two-lane highway. As the sun sank behind the mountains to the west-creating a Technicolor sky -- we put the pedal to the metal, trying to make time as we pushed toward Kingman, Arizona.

Six-cylinder power launched both of these SUVs, and both have new V-6 engines this year. The Explorer now uses the same 3.5-liter unit found in the Edge, with 290 hp and 255 lb-ft of torque. That's a big improvement over the outgoing SOHC V-6's 210 hp and 254 lb-ft, not to mention the weakling 155-hp V-6 at the Explorer's debut. It's no wonder that when Ford added a V-8 -- as gas prices tumbled and Ford learned that many Explorer owners used their vehicles for towing -- it proved a popular choice. However, the V-8 is no longer available on the new Explorer -- and Ford's Ecoboost V-6 isn't offered here, either. The new optional engine, arriving midyear, is an EcoBoost 2.0-liter four-cylinder, which will have less output (237 hp, 250 lb-ft) but better fuel economy.

The first Grand Cherokee came with a 4.0-liter straight six that wasn't exactly new back then, and Jeep, too, soon offered an optional V-8. Eventually, the 4.0 would be replaced by a 3.7-liter V-6, but it was the 5.7-liter Hemi V-8 that garnered all the attention. With the 2011 Grand Cherokee comes Chrysler's new Pentastar V-6. The 3.6-liter, aluminum-block V-6 blows away the old 3.7-liter's 210 hp and 235 lb-ft, making 290 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque -- virtually the same output as the Explorer's. But as we rolled north along the California/Arizona border, the Jeep seemed to have an easier time passing pickups and semis. Those who don't find it quick enough, however, at least have the option of more power with the Hemi.

oh yeah and it had 190 hp. :P compared to the Explorers measly 160 hp, yeah fords 4.0 was quality. 
And the "poor" quality you talk about, the inline 4.0 SIX cylinder, ran circles around fords mighty "windsor" and it got 4-5 better MPG than ANY Ford or Chevrolet 6 cylinder, and most of these engines are running FINE with 300,000 or 400,000 miles, find me a "quality" Ford that can handle that? Heck in 1975 with the Jeep J20, fords 3/4 truck couldn't stand up to the 401 V8, in towing or MPG. Jeep beat the competition time and time again, and a vast majority still run! See whats harder to find a 1995 explorer or a 1995 "poor quality" Cherokee. I know where my money is when I look at craigslist tomorrow. 
Someone who did a little more research, would note that the JEEP CHEROKEE (XJ) arrived in 1984, STARTED the real SUV trend, and it would run circles around the two followers made years after the XJ. Ford Bronco and GMC Jimmy were two to three years after the Cherokee (coincidence?) Then ford came out with its Explorer, replacing the Bronco. It was midway through the SUV trend, not the starter, not even close. Long live the CHEROKEE I'd say, its what brought you all of your "cute ute's" And we will GLADLY welcome it back when Jeep finally kills of this miserable Compass copy Liberty next year. 
Long live the Grand Cherokee! Wonder how it compares to a Land Rover LR4...

New Car Research

Find reviews, photos & pricing for:

Ford Explorer

Jeep Grand Cherokee

our instagram

get Automobile Magazine

Subscribe to the magazine and save up to 84% off the newsstand price


new cars

Read Related Articles