First Drive: 2011 Audi Q5 2.0T

Matt Tierney
#Audi, #Q5

We recently spent a year with a 2010 Audi Q5 3.2 and thoroughly enjoyed the vehicle. The size was quite nice, the premium materials held up well to four seasons of hard use, and the Quattro all-wheel-drive system got us through snow and mud without compromise during daily driving. During our year with the V-6 Q5, though, several editors wondered if Audi's stout 2.0T four-cylinder engine could meet our performance expectations while returning better fuel economy. To answer that question, we recently sampled a Q5 2.0T, which is a new offering for the 2011 model year.

If you aren't familiar with the VW/Audi 2.0T, you might be questioning the use of a four-banger in a 4000-pound vehicle. Don't let the displacement fool you, though. This little four makes use of direct injection and a turbocharger to deliver all the torque you'd need (15 lb-ft more than the V-6, in fact) while returning a respectable 20/27 mpg in the Q5. Perhaps the 211 hp looks meager on paper, but the eight-speed automatic does a fine job of maximizing the little engine's power and we never thought the Q5 2.0T was in need of more thrust, even when fully loaded. All 3.2-liter V-6 Q5s make do with Audi's existing six-speed automatic, which is still expertly, but fuel economy is estimated at 18/23 mpg. We would only recommend upgrading to the V-6 model if you plan on towing with any regularity.

Thanks to the smaller engine and decontenting, the Q5 2.0T starts at $7000 less than a V-6 model. Choosing the 2.0T, however, doesn't require that buyers sacrifice luxuries or technology since the most desirable equipment can be added back as options. Audi only offers the Q5 3.2 with 19- or 20-inch wheels while the Q5 2.0T comes with standard 18s. Even after upgrading a Q5 2.0T to 19-inch wheels, customers will see a $2300 savings for giving up two cylinders. You can't fully load the Q5 2.0T with a leather dash and armrests, wood trim, adaptive cruise control, or the S line exterior cosmetic package, but those options certainly don't define the Q5 experience. Audi shoppers have reinforced that, favoring the Q5 2.0T over the Q5 3.2 consistently since the four-cylinder models became common on dealer lots in August of 2010.

1 of 2
I own an '06 Jetta TDI and '09 Audi A4 2.0TAudi should offer (like fat chance)Q5 2.0TDIA4 2.0TDI with front wheel drive (with a larger fuel tank)A4 3.0TDI with quattroBoy am I dreaming.
"The small SUV/crossover segment isn't exactly a driver's paradise, but the Q5 is as good as it gets."IMO, for the small SUV/ute department, after testing the Q5 and the Acura RDX, and many other SUVs, (Caddy SRX, FX35, Murano, etc) the RDX is the better driver. It was almost car-like. Throttle response, handling, etc were class-leading. I didn't end up buying it because it lacked some features (power liftgate) and the rear seats require extra work to pull down, but it definitely can drive.All that being said, the Q5 is a great SUV, and the 2.0 is a natural addition. And is such a small sacrifice in performance, it's no wonder its cannibalizing sales of the 3.2. Now if they offered the 3.0S at the pricepoint of the 3.2 and scrapped the 3.2 altogether... (the 3.2 is an old motor that they need to retire)
good article.I always favored a diesel 2.0 option but it wouldnt be for everyone. A 2.0 TDI would obviously be slower, but the fuel economy would be spectacular, >32 mpg.

New Car Research

our instagram

get Automobile Magazine

Subscribe to the magazine and save up to 84% off the newsstand price


new cars

Read Related Articles