Automobile Magazine Homepage Subscribe Now  

Tall Wagon Comparison: 2010 Toyota Venza vs. 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour vs. 2010 Nissan Murano

 
2010 Toyota Venza specs

Price Range: $29,550

Base Engine: 268 hp /3.5L V6

MPG Range: 19 city / 26 hwy

Research 2010 Toyota Venza
get a quote

For nearly two decades, the Toyota Camry, the Honda Accord, and the Nissan Altima have been slugging it out atop the mid-size car segment. After so many years of close combat, it's only natural that the feud has spilled over into a new arena -- tall wagons.

Nissan was to the first to explore this territory in 2003, when it essentially added a tall body and a lifted suspension to the Altima platform and christened it the Murano. It's been so successful over the past seven years that one has to wonder why it took so long for the other two big Japanese carmakers to follow suit. Well, they're here. The Murano, redesigned for 2009, now faces high-roofed versions of the Accord and Camry in the form of the Honda Accord Crosstour and the Toyota Venza.

Like their sedan progenitors, these three light crossovers match up very closely, each seating five people and powering the front or all four wheels with a 3.5-liter V-6 (the Venza can be also be fitted with a 2.7-liter four-cylinder). However, the vehicles do differ quite significantly in shape and purpose, ranging in character from traditional crossover (Murano) to luxurious large hatchback (Crosstour). We gathered well-equipped versions of each vehicle to see which mutant mid-sizer best fulfills the needs of this fledgling segment.

  • 2010 Toyota Venza Nissan Murano Honda Accord Crosstour Rear View
  • 2010 Toyota Venza Nissan Murano Honda Accord Crosstour Front Three Quarters View
  • 2010 Toyota Venza Nissan Murano Honda Accord Crosstour Front Three Quarters View
Next Page »
21
Comments
Please enter your username

Please enter your password
You must be logged in to post
Not registered?
 
Barrelhead Commented on 07/07/10 at: 9:07 PM I had the opportunity to experience both the Crosstour and Venza side-by-side over the weekend ~ thanks to friends.  The Crosstour is hands-down the most attractive of the two and the most pleasing to drive.  The Crosstour was sporty and agile; the Venza was sluggish, truck-like in handling, and rather droll.  I received a number of compliments from strangers while out-and-about in the Crosstour; the Venza went unnoticed. If given a choice between the two, I would choose the Crosstour without hesitation.
daysailor7 Commented on 13/06/10 at: 2:06 AM I purchased a Murano in 03 and put 100K on it.  Never had a single problem. It's only negative was poor "premium" gas milage.  Last year, we bought a Venza and it has been perfect so far.  The ride is carlike and very quiet.  David Zenlea, the reviewer, seems to have confused these three crossovers with other sports sedans or perhaps thinks they should perform like a $60K Porsche Cayenne.  In either case, this review is meaningless.
David.Zenlea Commented on 11/06/10 at: 5:56 PM Subarudonelp – fair point. It's always difficult to figure out where to draw the line of what to include and what not to in a comparo. We did recently run the Outback in a crossover round up (http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/driven/1003_japanese_crossover_suv_comparison/index.html) but the argument can be made that it fits here as well.
Evan.McCausland Commented on 11/06/10 at: 1:18 PM Hmm. Where's this race everyone keeps mentioning? Didn't see it in the story...
Subarudonelp Commented on 11/06/10 at: 12:24 AM Where is Subaru other car magazine are remembering the remaining forerunner of the crossover segment, the Subaru Outback. Some have even made their SUV of the year, made record sales even in this economy. Why is this magazine still disrespecting Subaru.
ILikeYourCar Commented on 10/06/10 at: 9:32 PM Wow, just wow. I'd argue with this article, but almost everybody has said what I had in mind. I just read until the Venza... and its just plain ridiculous. A TALL WAGON (as it is titled) is NOT meant to be raced. And that review about the Venza is filled with so much HATE... why? I have too actually driven it and is SO good. And I too stop subscribing to your mag. Im glad I did.
BIPKAS Commented on 10/06/10 at: 7:07 PM It is the winner of ugly, least cargo space, worst ride and poor dash buttons.
peterj2706 Commented on 10/06/10 at: 5:27 PM So once again, Honda (interchange with BMW) wins a comparision even though it is the ugliest, and has the design which provides the worst utility (and these are 'utility' vehicles).    Surprise, surprise.  Do you really think people buy these to street race with two kids in the back?
japaru Commented on 10/06/10 at: 5:13 PM Review is another reason I stopped subscribing to your paper edition. I have 4 cylinder 2009 Venza. $10,000.00 more for the funny-looking Honda?? No way! I seem to recall that your initial review of the Venza was very favorable. Big turn around for reasons unclear. Maybe Honda should wise up and produce a 4 cylinder model!
BIPKAS Commented on 10/06/10 at: 4:30 PM At first you said Venza should be #1 and then you slipped .To downgrade it to #3 because of interior is totally wrong. Very nice feel inside. Most other auto reviews of the Crosstour are very poor. Has Honda been taking you to lunch?

Subscription Savings

Subscribe Offers

Vehicle Research Center

Check out photos, specifications and pricing for all vehicles in our buyer's guide.