News

2013 Cadillac ATS V-6 Rated At 19/28 MPG With Rear-Wheel Drive

The Environmental Protection Agency has dished up another set of fuel-economy figures for the 2013 Cadillac ATS. This time, the EPA tested the new ATS sports sedan with its 3.6-liter V-6 engine and six-speed automatic transmission. Models equipped with rear-wheel drive will return 19/28 mpg (city/highway), while equipping an ATS with all-wheel drive lowers economy to 18/26 mpg.

The optional V-6 is the most powerful engine choice for the 2013 Cadillac ATS, producing 321 hp and 275 lb-ft of torque. We previously learned that the car’s base engine, a 2.5-liter inline-four with 202 hp, will return economy of 22/33 mpg. That engine is only offered with an automatic transmission and rear-wheel drive.

The only remaining numbers concern the Cadillac’s new 2.0-liter turbo-four engine, which is rated for 272 hp and 260 lb-ft. Cadillac expects the turbo engine will account for about half of all 2013 ATS sales; it’s available with both rear- and all-wheel drive, and is the only way to equip an ATS with a six-speed manual transmission. Fuel economy for this turbo mill will probably fall in between the ratings for the 2.5-liter and 3.6-liter engines.

So, how does the 2013 Cadillac ATS V-6’s fuel economy stack up against its competitors? The 2012 Mercedes-Benz C350 sedan has a 302-hp 3.5-liter V-6 that returns 20/29 mpg with rear-wheel drive. The 2012 Infiniti G37 sedan has a 328-hp 3.7-liter V-6 rated for 19/27 mpg with an automatic transmission and rear-wheel drive, or 18/25 mpg with all-wheel drive. And the 2012 Lexus IS350 sedan has a 306-hp 3.5-liter V-6 engine good for 19/27 mpg with rear-wheel drive, and 18/26 mpg with all-wheel drive.

Pricing for the 2013 Cadillac ATS starts at $33,990 (including destination), but opting for the 3.6-liter V-6 engine will set buyers back at least $42,090.

Source: EPA

Comments

We’ve Temporarily Removed Comments

As part of our ongoing efforts to make AutomobileMag.com better, faster, and easier for you to use, we’ve temporarily removed comments as well as the ability to comment. We’re testing and reviewing options to possibly bring comments back. As always, thanks for reading AutomobileMag.com.