Reviews

2001-2006 Ford Escape XLS Sport

For a year and a half, Ford has been hiding the two-wheel-drive, four-cylinder base version of its Escape from the press—and now we know why. With not even two-thirds the power of its V-6 counterpart, the 127-horsepower, four-cylinder Escape can barely pull a feather out of a chicken’s behind. Not only is it slow, but the Zetec engine is coarse and noisy to boot. It’s a good thing the sixteen-valve four produces its torque down low, because revving it past 4000 rpm drowns out the radio. Despite its lack of power, the front-wheel-drive Escape still spins its inside front wheel at the slightest provocation and suffers from excessive understeer, although the steering is nicely weighted and accurate.

The four-cylinder Escape makes one wonder why on earth anyone would pay $4000 more for this than for Ford’s own Focus wagon.

We know people buy SUVs for their high seating position, their image, and their go-anywhere ability, and because they can haul stuff. But while the Focus wagon can’t provide the image or the lofty perch, it has better traction,more rear-seat legroom, and, with the rear seats up, more cargo volume (rear seats folded, the Escape wins by nine cubic feet). And when equipped with the 130-horsepower Zetec engine, the Focus is lively, with superb ride and handling.

The V-6 all-wheel-drive Escape has been highly praised, and rightly so. The four-cylinder, front-wheel-drive version just doesn’t cut it, especially compared with the and the .

Comments
We’ve Temporarily Removed Comments

As part of our ongoing efforts to make AutomobileMag.com better, faster, and easier for you to use, we’ve temporarily removed comments as well as the ability to comment. We’re testing and reviewing options to possibly bring comments back. As always, thanks for reading AutomobileMag.com.

Buying Guide
Powered by Motortrend

EPA MPG:

23 City / 27 Hwy

Cargo (Std/Max):

NA / 33 cu. ft.

Seating:

5/5