2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class

C250 Sport RWD 4-Dr Sedan I4 auto trans

2013 mercedes-benz c-class Reviews and News

2013 Audi RS5 2012 BMW M3 Coupe 2013 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Coupe And 2013 Porsche Boxster S Parked
Three 400-plus-hp coupes jostle to occupy the same space and win the same buyers. They exist in an automotive sweet spot, delivering luxury, performance, style, and excitement at an attainable price. Spend more money, and you'll face diminishing returns. Spend less, and you'll have less of a car.
Although the similarities are unmistakable, each is concocted from a unique formula with its own set of attributes. The Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG taps into man's innate lust for the thrust and roar of a big-displacement V-8. New to the States for 2013, the Audi RS5 elevates expectations of sophistication and speed. And the legendary, long-standing king, the BMW M3, has established itself as a rarefied driver's car.
To this mix of thoroughbred coupes, we also added a ringer, the Porsche Boxster S. With a folding roof, a mid-mounted engine, and space for just two people, the Boxster is nothing like the other cars, yet it lands in the same space when it comes to price and performance.
Just what do you get for your money? These cars all manage 60 mph in the mid-four-second range and blistering track times for an average base price of $64,719. So Porsche, BMW, Audi, or Mercedes-Benz? That's the $64,000 question.

Fourth Place
Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG

There's a reason AMG's two most important ambassadors cling to this 6.2-liter V-8. Whereas every other eight-cylinder AMG Benz adopts a twin-turbo 5.5-liter, the SLS AMG and the C63 AMG exist in a niche where character means more than numbers. The C63 isn't simply 451 hp of car. It's manic.
This Mercedes can be tame, even benign, if you're asleep at the wheel, but feed in enough right pedal and you might imagine a nitromethane tap opening somewhere under the hood. At full throttle, the thick rim in your hands becomes less like a steering wheel and more like an Alcantara grab handle. And that turn ahead? This car has a knack for sideways drifts.
Yes, the C63 can be hazardous to your health. Not only does it pressure you into gross acts of power-on oversteer, it leads to addiction. To the thunderous exhaust note. To 443 lb-ft of torque. To matting the gas pedal, over and over and over again.
You (and we) want the good stuff, so order the $6050 development package that swaps in lighter, stronger engine internals; adds 30 hp; and juices the top speed to 174 mph. Launch control (apply brakes, set stability control to sport, dial transmission to RS, pull right paddle, stomp gas, release brake, go fast) will propel this hulk to 60 mph in 4.4 seconds, but get the sequence wrong and you'll be treated to a 4500-rpm clutch dump that immolates the rear rubber in a smoky scene that would make Michael Bay envious.
Hell of an engine, dog of a transmission. The C63 uses the same seven-speed automatic found in every other Mercedes with fewer than twelve cylinders, except that AMG unbolts the torque converter -- that's the source of the "slush" in slushbox -- and installs a direct-acting clutch pack in its place. Trading fluid for friction leads to crisper, quicker launches and more precise downshifts. Still, the Mercedes' gearchanges feel a skosh slower than those of the dual-clutch automatic gearboxes used by every other competitor here. We wish that was our biggest complaint.
Instead, we're dealing with straight-up insubordination. Even with the transmission controller twisted to manual, the paddle shifters retain the authority to overrule -- or at least ignore -- the driver's commands. Far more egregious on a not-especially-hot August morning at Michigan's Grattan Raceway, we couldn't log more than three laps at a time before the C63 called it quits. The computers booted us out of manual mode and into a limp mode that yielded barely enough power to accelerate the 3804-pound Mercedes. After less than five minutes of flat-out driving, the $83,845, 481-hp AMG had the motive energy of a Honda Fit towing a school bus.
That's too bad, because the C63 didn't need to come in last in this test. In those first couple of laps, with full power, we were able to record a time just 0.01 second behind the BMW. There's no hiding the weight of that big engine over the front wheels and a tendency to push in corners, yet there's a lot to like about the AMG on the racetrack. There's a natural heft and precision to the steering, utter control in the suspension, and gobs of torque no matter where the tach needle is pointing.
The C63 is even more fun on the road, where the roguish exhaust, on-demand thrust, and capable chassis make it an attraction whether it's sitting at a stoplight, painting black stripes in a straight line, or tearing through a corner. There's no shortage of street cred here. Once-stuffy Mercedes looks more like an attention-seeking adolescent with this particular C63, accessorized with a vivid red interior and an exposed carbon-fiber lip spoiler. Those details strike us as a bit tawdry and at odds with the C-class's otherwise conservative styling, but what do we know? Of the three coupes, the Mercedes drew the most looks and comments wherever we went.
It's easy to get caught up in what AMG has done with this car, but we also love that it is still very much a Mercedes. The C63 AMG is civil enough for the workaday world of urban and suburban commuting but can transform itself instantly when an open stretch of road presents itself. Just don't expect too much if that road leads to a track.

Third Place
Audi RS5

Talk about confidence. The RS5 is the new guy here, and yet Audi has the moxie to strut in with the highest base price by a $4860 margin. We're sold, though, because the RS5 justifies the premium before you even start the engine. The cabin strikes the best balance of upscale, stylish, and tasteful. The optional Google Maps navigation is now joined by Google Street View, which shows a ground-level image of your destination. The underhood presentation is immaculate, with red valve covers, a small composite manifold cover, and handsome badging. Both the seats and the steering wheel are perfectly shaped and placed. And you can't put a price on beauty. The broad shoulders, meaty wheels, and fierce headlights look aggressive without being tacky. We just wish the snub-nosed, slack-jawed face were more elegant.
The RS5 also earns accolades for its 4.2-liter V-8. Arguably the best powerplant in this test, it straddles the line between the burly Merc engine and the peaky BMW mill. The 450-hp unit builds fury all the way to the 8500-rpm fuel cutoff, yet the long 3.7-inch stroke gives it a 22 lb-ft of torque advantage over the M3. The best of both worlds, the RS5 combines instantaneous responsiveness with high-end drama. Ask it to perform, and the RS5 delivers with silky power and an equally honeyed exhaust note.
Yet, other than when you rev the engine to the top of the tach, drama is hard to come by. The all-wheel-drive system, unique in this group of rear-drivers, takes some of the edge and excitement out of accelerating and cornering. The seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission is so proficient that it neither detracts from nor defines the driving experience. Rather, it moves between gears so smoothly, so quickly, and so reliably that its actions often go unnoticed. Our test car's standard steering setup was far more natural than the optional variable-ratio steering we've previously driven, but it still pales in comparison to the directness of the Porsche, BMW, and Mercedes systems. There's a wide range of effort between Drive Select's comfort, auto, and dynamic modes, yet none feels quite right.
The sport rear differential, on the other hand, can do no wrong. By sending more torque to the outer rear wheel in a turn, it keeps the car from plowing to the outside of corners. More precisely, it allows the driver to point the car into a corner at a sane speed, get on the gas early, and exit at a velocity approaching reckless driving. The car rotates so precisely under throttle that there's a whiff of the same calculating, computerized machinations that are the essence of a Nissan GT-R. The differential is not quite as effective on the track, however, where the RS5's nose-heavy weight distribution is too much for the trick diff to overcome and understeer becomes apparent.
Contributor Marc Noordeloos called the RS5 "the least impressive car on the track," aggravated by the distant steering, the inherent understeer, and the overwhelmed brakes. Yet the numbers say something very different. The RS5 walked away with the quickest lap time by more than 0.6 second, putting more than 1.5 seconds on both the Mercedes and the BMW. The Audi is unbelievably quick -- literally. "There is no way the RS5 was that fast," Noordeloos gaped. But the numbers don't lie. Every single lap we recorded in the RS5 was quicker than anything the other cars could muster.
This leaves us with a moral dilemma of recognizing achievement or rewarding personality. The Audi and the BMW could have easily swapped places in the final standings. Yet we can't in good conscience put the RS5 ahead of a car that we find more desirable. Before we had a clear picture of the lap-time pecking order, it was the M3 that we were fawning over in the pits. Attractive, comfortable, and wickedly fast, the RS5 is lovable for everything it does on the road, but we don't lust after it because of what it does on the track.

Second place
BMW M3

The M3 for so long was pretty much the only game in town. Audi and Mercedes armed four-doors to poach M's customers, but they never succeeded in achieving greatness. You either bought the BMW or you bought the wrong car. That's hardly the case today, with both of the M3's direct competitors -- the C63 AMG and the RS5 -- offering a credible and compelling alternative. Yet the BMW M3 still sets the standard for the class, even as the oldest member of the group.
Its age does show, however. The high-strung 4.0-liter V-8 was magnificent five years ago. Today, it's merely great, overshadowed by the stronger and more extroverted personalities of the Mercedes and Audi engines. The gearbox shows shades of SMG, the automated manual of the E46-chassis M3 that was phenomenal on the track and fussy in the city. Compared with its competitors, the M3's dual-clutch automatic exhibits lazier shifts in auto mode. On one occasion, we pulled away from a red light with the lurch-and-buck launch of an absolute novice driving a three-pedal transmission. Early on, we seriously wondered how far back the BMW might finish in this test.
And then, after a long day of schlepping around for photos, we finally escaped the tourist-packed summer towns and our plodding photo car for a chance to attack the wide sweepers of northwestern Michigan's M-22. Deputy editor Joe DeMatio was the first to fall for the M3. "Forget any of the negative things I might have said earlier about this car," his voice crackled over the two-way radio.
It may not be the placid daily driver that the Audi and the Mercedes are, but the M3 sets itself apart from those two cars with every hard and fast mile you drive. The eight individual throttles follow every twitch of your right foot. Behind the fiddly gear selector, there's a rocker switch with an odd icon that might be mistaken for a volume control. It actually alters the intensity and the speed of the shifts. In manual mode, the gearbox interprets every up- and downshift before you've finished pulling the paddle, and the M3 can deliver the hardest and quickest shifts of any car here. We wouldn't have it any other way, except, of course, with a true manual transmission -- and the M3 is the only car of the three coupes to offer one.
After driving the Audi and the Mercedes, the BMW reveals a lightness and agility that you might otherwise take for granted. Its svelte chassis is beautifully complemented by surprisingly light steering that guides the car with pinpoint accuracy, while the suspension is planted but supple. The M3 is the embodiment of everything that BMW stands for: a potent engine, a balanced chassis, clairvoyant steering, and -- the key differentiator -- how they're all seamlessly integrated together.
At the absolute limit, the M3 does reveal some dicey manners. Add throttle in a corner, and the speed-sensing rear differential will suddenly shift grunt to the outside wheel, inducing snap oversteer. "The M3 was the only car that was difficult to drive quickly. I had to work the hardest for my lap time in this car," Noordeloos reported. He also set the brakes on fire. Fortunately, there's a distinct line between toying with the M3 and provoking its aggression, and you can have a blast on either side of that line.
Although the base prices of these cars average about $64,000, it's only the M3 that avoids sticker shock when the options are added. With an as-tested price of $69,595, the M3 is a stripper of sorts, with a no-frills interior devoid of navigation and power seats. We're OK with that, though. The manual sport seats are infinitely adjustable and fit any driver just so, and the sterile interior amplifies the feeling that you're in a purposeful, specialized machine.
That's exactly what makes the M3 our pick over the Mercedes-Benz and the Audi. It's not just a faster 3-series, it is a totally different car. A better car. While AMG and Quattro add speed and sound, M adds emotion. We're feeling it.

First place
Porsche Boxster S

The ringer wins. It is perhaps not surprising that a lightweight, mid-engine roadster won out against three heavier coupes, but it wasn't a given, either. The Boxster's competition was universally more powerful, quicker in a straight line, more practical on the road, and cheaper off the dealership lot. So how'd it win? By engaging and thrilling the driver in everything it does.
For one, the Boxster is striking to look at. Porsche's design studio has put some muscle and presence into the Boxster's traditionally delicate design. We also love the rich lime-gold paint but not the fact that it's one of several four-figure additions that lead to the incomprehensible cost of $28,685 for optional equipment. Try to filter out the extras and strip the Boxster down to its basics, because it's this Porsche's very core that is so very good.
The Boxster S is quick and its 315-hp engine sings a special flat-six song on the climb up the tach, but it's easy to become power hungry when every other car has about 100 hp on you. We're not so delusional to think that Porsche will up the output as long as it's selling the 911, so we propose a compromise: shorter gearing. In several turns where the other cars were content with third gear, the Boxster required second. Numerically higher gearing would quicken acceleration, increase torque at the rear wheels, and create more opportunities for using the ideally placed paddle shifters behind the steering wheel.
The PDK dual-clutch automatic transmission clicks through its seven gears with the speed of a firing pin, and the punch of every shift hits harder as you tap into Sport and Sport Plus modes. This gearbox falls just short of perfection. With Sport Plus activated and the gear selector pushed into manual mode, the computer still retains some control. The transmission will downshift to the lowest possible gear or upshift at redline if you've pushed the gas pedal through its kickdown switch, and on the track, a right foot in pursuit of full-throttle acceleration can't be bothered with a wimpy detent at the end of the pedal travel.
These are petty gripes; the Porsche is driving bliss on the road and the track. It is poised and planted, with puttylike grip and unflappable handling. The perfect steering -- not too heavy and not too light, great on-center action, and excellent feel -- makes the M3's seem ho-hum. And it's more than 400 pounds lighter than the other cars. Added together, these qualities instill a confidence that leads to superlegal cornering speeds on the road.
Our lap jockey deemed it "the only car here that could run at the track all day without breaking a sweat." Credit that to the most robust brakes in this bunch. Whereas every other car exhibited some fade during timed laps, the Porsche's brake pedal remained firm as it laid down faster times than the M3 and the C63 AMG. Part of the Boxster's allure is that it is so easy to drive so quickly. It takes a concerted effort or an unforgivable mistake to bring the rear end around. Instead, the Boxster gives off only the faintest whiff of understeer in what is quite possibly the industry's most neutral-handling car. With a more experienced driver piloting the faster Audi, one of our younger staffers shadowed the RS5's every move (save his brief disappearance on the long straight) for a full lap before the Audi driver relented and waved him by. It isn't the fastest car here, but there's a good chance the Boxster is the car that you would be fastest in.
If you've been paying attention, you've noticed that we can't quite separate the coupes from their shortcomings. The M3 is an edgy driver's delight that can be high maintenance on the street. The C63 and the RS5 are capable on the track but truly excellent on the road. Choosing the Boxster S means not having to choose sides. It is just as livable on well-worn roads as it is fierce on a track. Skip the pricey options, and it can be the answer to your $64,000 question, too.
Lap Times
Grattan Raceway
| 2.2 miles
Audi RS5 1:28.48
Porsche Boxster S 1:29.10
BMW M3 1:30.05
Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG 1:30.06

2013 Audi RS5

BASE PRICE: $69,795
PRICE AS TESTED: $77,320
POWERTRAIN
ENGINE:
32-valve DOHC V-8
DISPLACEMENT: 4.2 liters (254 cu in)
POWER: 450 hp @ 8250 rpm
TORQUE: 317 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 7-speed automatic
DRIVE: 4-wheel
CHASSIS
STEERING:
Electrically assisted
FRONT SUSPENSION: Multilink, coil springs
REAR SUSPENSION: Multilink, coil springs
BRAKES: Vented discs, ABS
TIRES: Pirelli PZero
TIRE SIZE: 275/30YR-20
MEASUREMENTS
L x W x H:
183.0 x 73.2 x 53.8 in
WHEELBASE: 108.3 in
TRACK F/R: 62.4/62.3 in
WEIGHT: 4037 lb
WEIGHT DIST. F/R: 57.8/42.2%
EPA MILEAGE: 16/23 mpg
TEST RESULTS
0-60 MPH:
4.6 sec
0-100 MPH: 10.8 sec
1/4-MILE: 13.0 sec @ 110 mph
30-70 MPH PASSING: 4.5 sec
PEAK ACCELERATION: 0.85 g
SPEED IN GEARS: 1) 42; 2) 68; 3) 98; 4) 130; 5) 167; 6) 174; 7) --- mph
CORNERING L/R: 0.97/0.95 g
70-0 MPH BRAKING: 152 ft
PEAK BRAKING: 1.15 g

2012 BMW M3 coupe

BASE PRICE: $62,295
PRICE AS TESTED: $69,595
POWERTRAIN
ENGINE:
32-valve DOHC V-8
DISPLACEMENT: 4.0 liters (244 cu in)
POWER: 414 hp @ 8300 rpm
TORQUE: 295 lb-ft @ 3900 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 7-speed automatic
DRIVE: Rear-wheel
CHASSIS
STEERING:
Electrohydraulically assisted
FRONT SUSPENSION: Strut-type, coil springs
REAR SUSPENSION: Multilink, coil springs
BRAKES: Vented discs, ABS
TIRES: Michelin Pilot Sport
TIRE SIZE F, R: 245/35YR-19, 265/35YR-19
MEASUREMENTS
L x W x H:
181.8 x 71.0 x 55.8 in
WHEELBASE: 108.7 in
TRACK F/R: 60.6/60.6 in
WEIGHT: 3576 lb
WEIGHT DIST. F/R: 51.2/48.8%
EPA MILEAGE: 14/20 mpg
TEST RESULTS
0-60 MPH:
4.6 sec
0-100 MPH: 10.6 sec
1/4-MILE: 13.0 sec @ 111 mph
30-70 MPH PASSING: 4.0 sec
PEAK ACCELERATION: 0.73 g
SPEED IN GEARS: 1) 44; 2) 71; 3) 97; 4) 124; 5) 150; 6) 155; 7) --- mph
CORNERING L/R: 1.00/0.99 g
70-0 MPH BRAKING: 141 ft
PEAK BRAKING: 1.16 g

2013 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG coupe

BASE PRICE: $64,935
PRICE AS TESTED: $83,845
POWERTRAIN
ENGINE:
32-valve DOHC V-8
DISPLACEMENT: 6.2 liters (379 cu in)
POWER: 481 hp @ 6500 rpm
TORQUE: 443 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 7-speed automatic
DRIVE: Rear-wheel
CHASSIS
STEERING:
Hydraulically assisted
FRONT SUSPENSION: Strut-type, coil springs
REAR SUSPENSION: Multilink, coil springs
BRAKES: Vented discs, ABS
TIRES: Continental ContiSportContact
TIRE SIZE F, R: 235/40YR-18, 255/35YR-18
MEASUREMENTS
L x W x H:
185.3 x 69.7 x 54.6 in
WHEELBASE: 108.9 in
TRACK F/R: 62.4/61.5 in
WEIGHT: 3804 lb
WEIGHT DIST. F/R: 53.8/46.2%
EPA MILEAGE: 13/19 mpg
TEST RESULTS
0-60 MPH:
4.4 sec
0-100 MPH: 10.0 sec
1/4-MILE: 12.3 sec @ 117 mph
30-70 MPH PASSING: 4.4 sec
PEAK ACCELERATION: 0.71 g
SPEED IN GEARS: 1) 41; 2) 63; 3) 94; 4) 131; 5) 174; 6) ---; 7) --- mph
CORNERING L/R: 0.94/0.94 g
70-0 MPH BRAKING: 165 ft
PEAK BRAKING: 1.04 g

2013 Porsche Boxster S

BASE PRICE: $61,850
PRICE AS TESTED: $90,535
POWERTRAIN
ENGINE:
24-valve DOHC flat-6
DISPLACEMENT: 3.4 liters (210 cu in)
POWER: 315 hp @ 6700 rpm
TORQUE: 266 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 7-speed automatic
DRIVE: Rear-wheel
CHASSIS
STEERING:
Electrically assisted
FRONT SUSPENSION: Strut-type, coil springs
REAR SUSPENSION: Strut-type, coil springs
BRAKES: Vented discs, ABS
TIRES: Pirelli PZero
TIRE SIZE F, R: 235/35YR-20, 265/35YR-20
MEASUREMENTS
L x W x H:
172.2 x 70.9 x 50.0 in
WHEELBASE: 97.4 in
TRACK F/R: 60.1/60.6 in
WEIGHT: 3133 lb
WEIGHT DIST. F/R: 44.6/55.4%
EPA MILEAGE: 21/30 mpg
TEST RESULTS
0-60 MPH:
4.8 sec
0-100 MPH: 11.9 sec
1/4-MILE: 13.3 sec @ 106 mph
30-70 MPH PASSING: 4.5 sec
PEAK ACCELERATION: 0.78 g
SPEED IN GEARS: 1) 42; 2) 71; 3) 99; 4) 125; 5) 151; 6) 172; 7) --- mph
CORNERING L/R: 1.02/1.01 g
70-0 MPH BRAKING: 137 ft
PEAK BRAKING: 1.20 g
2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class

New For 2013

The C-class got a thorough refresh last year, headlined by the addition of a four-cylinder engine and a two-door body style. Accordingly, there are few changes this year for Mercedes’ smallest model. The new AMG Sports Package Plus bestows the C-class with a specially tuned exhaust, a sport interior with contrasting seatbelts, eighteen-inch wheels, and, on coupes, a revised front suspension.

Overview

Mercedes-Benz’s C-class covers a broad spectrum of power, equipment, and price. As a driver’s car, the C-class doesn’t deliver the same all-around balance that makes the BMW 3-series so great. However, Mercedes places a larger emphasis on luxury and refinement. Every C-class has a quiet cabin, a composed ride, excellent build quality, and an assertive but well-mannered powertrain. The C-class offers comfortable seats; a slick, three-spoke, flat-bottomed steering wheel; and a 5.8-inch display that integrates HD Radio, Bluetooth, and a USB port. The downsized C250 achieves a 21/31 mpg fuel-economy rating, but its smallish displacement means it isn’t as potent as BMW’s 240-hp turbo four. The C350’s direct-injected 3.5-liter revs eagerly and accelerates quickly. Buyers who desire all-wheel drive can choose the C350 coupe or the C300 sedan, which uses a less-potent, 228-hp V-6. A smooth-shifting seven-speed automatic is standard, but it’s not quite as quick as the eight-speed gearboxes of some competitors. The proletarian C-class might cede some performance to the BMW 3-series, but for the C63 AMG, which packs a 6.2-liter V-8 that charges off the line with an authority that is absent in BMW’s M3. The BMW boasts a more neutral, tactile chassis, but the Mercedes is a different kind of fun on the track.

Safety

ABS; front, side, front pelvis, side curtain, and driver’s knee air bags; traction and stability control; tire-pressure monitors; and drowsiness alert are standard. Automatic high-beams, lane-keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, swiveling headlights, parking sensors, and rear side air bags are optional.

You'll like:

  • More refined than a 3-series
  • Excellent build quality
  • C63 AMG is as good as an M3

You won't like:

  • Nav system has a steep learning curve
  • Not as nimble as a 3-series

Key Competitors For The 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-class

  • Audi A4/S4
  • BMW 3-series
  • Infiniti G
  • Lexus IS
Mercedes Benz C Class Prototype Left Side 1
A 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class sedan wearing less camouflage than we've seen before has been spotted along with another fully-covered prototype. The redesigned C-Class will be the fourth new or redesigned Mercedes sedan in the stable after the CLA-, E-, and S-Class four-doors arrive.
2015 Mercedes Benz C Class Sedan Front Three Quarter 1
Life has not been kind to the three-pointed star lately. The A-Class was criticized for its poor packaging and the harsh ride, the B-Class for its bland design, the CLA-Class for being over-styled, the facelifted E-Class for not righting enough of the wrongs, and the new S-Class for courting ostentatious luxury. Next in line for their verdicts are the GLA-Class crossover (due in September) and the new C-Class range (due in March 2014) – the latter of which promises to be exceptional in more ways than one.
2014 Mercedes Benz C Class Front Three Quarter
The 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class is slated to be revealed next year, but a new interview has given us a clearer idea on what to expect from the next C-Class range. Expect the small Mercedes to more closely mirror the plethora of variants offered by the BMW 3 Series in the future with the addition of a convertible, a diesel, and a hybrid.
2014 Mercedes Benz C Class Rear Side
If you pay attention to our monthly sales reports, you may have noticed that the Mercedes-Benz C-Class outsold the BMW 3 Series during the month of January. Benz is undoubtedly patting itself on the back, but the automaker is also hard at work on the next-gen 2014 Mercedes-Benz C-Class, which could steal even more sales away from BMW thanks to new powertrains, added features, and new styling. We recently captured the C-Class on the streets, where the new sedan showed off more of its rear end.
2014 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Edition 507 Coupe Front Three Quarter 3
While most AMG Mercedes-Benz cars use turbochargers to make their eye-popping horsepower numbers, the C63 AMG is one of only three models to make its power without forced induction. In case you thought the C63 AMG engine's future was unclear, AMG just released a new special edition C63 that uses some engineering witchcraft to tune the 6.2-liter V-8 all the way up to 507 horsepower.

Change Vehicle

Research Now

Certified Pre-Owned 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Pricing

Certified Pre Owned Price
$27,325

Used 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Values / Pricing

Suggested Retail Price
$35,350

Free Price Quote

Compare dealer clearance prices and save.
Select this Vehicle

Compare The 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Click Circles to Compare

Your Selected Vehicle's Ranking

rank
23
2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
C250 Sport RWD 4-Dr Sedan I4
22 MPG City | 31 MPG Hwy
Top Ranking Vehicles - MPG
rank
2
rank
3
rank
4
rank
25
2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
C250 Sport RWD 4-Dr Sedan I4
$35,350
Top Ranking Vehicles - Price
rank
34
2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
C250 Sport RWD 4-Dr Sedan I4
201hp
Top Ranking Vehicles - Horsepower

2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications

Quick Glance:
Engine
1.8L I4Engine
Fuel economy City:
22 MPG
Fuel economy Highway:
31 MPG
Horsepower:
201 hp @ 5500rpm
Torque:
229 ft lb of torque @ 2200rpm
  • Air Conditioning
  • Power Windows
  • Power Locks
  • Power Seats
  • Steering Wheel Tilt
  • Cruise Control
  • Sunroof
  • ABS
  • Stabilizer Front
  • Stabilizer RearABS
  • Electronic Traction Control
  • Electronic Stability Control
  • Locking Differential (optional)
  • Limited Slip Differential (optional)
  • Airbag Driver
  • Airbag Passenger
  • Airbag Side Front
  • Airbag Side Rear (optional)
  • Radio
  • CD Player
  • CD Changer (optional)
  • DVD
  • Navigation
Vehicle
50,000 miles / 48 months
Powertrain
50,000 miles / 48 months
Corrosion
50,000 miles / 48 months
Roadside
Unlimited miles / 999 months
NHTSA Rating Front Driver
4
NHTSA Rating Front Passenger
4
NHTSA Rating Front Side
5
NHTSA Rating Rear Side
5
NHTSA Rating Overall
5
NHTSA Rating Rollover
4
IIHS Front Moderate Overlap
Good
IIHS Overall Side Crash
Good
IIHS Best Pick
1
IIHS Rear Crash
Good
IIHS Roof Strength
Good
IIHS Front Small Overlap
N/R

Find Used Mercedes-Benz C-Classs For Sale

Search through millions of listings in the Automobile Magazine classifieds

5-Year Total Cost to Own For The 2013 Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Depreciation
27.2%
Loss in Value + Expenses
= 5 Year Cost to Own
Depreciation
$11,346
27.2%
Insurance
$10,065
24.1%
Fuel Cost
$10,717
25.7%
Financing
$2,991
7.2%
Maintenance
$3,931
9.4%
Repair Costs
$2,294
5.5%
State Fees
$413
1%
Five Year Cost of Ownership: $41,757 What's This?
Value Rating: Below Average