New GM: 2007-2008 Impala Suspension Problems Were Old GM’s Problems, Not Ours

Do the sons bear the sins of the fathers or not? The answer to that is a big no, if you’re asking General Motors: it has filed in U.S. District Court to dismiss a class-action lawsuit against it, saying that it’s improper to sue “new” GM for problems created by “old” GM. The class action lawsuit, which we’ve previously reported on, was filed by owners of model year 2007 and 2008 Chevrolet Impalas. Those years of Impala suffered from faulty rear suspension rods, which meant that tires wore down prematurely. The suit explicitly named Impala owner Donna Trusky of Blakely, PA, whose rear tires wore out in only 6,000 miles. The problem also extended to the Impala model used for law enforcement purposes, but Chevrolet recalled those models and fixed the suspensions free of charge. Chevy told civilian owners that because the Impala PPV has different suspension parts, regular Impalas were exempt from the recall. The class-action suit tried to compel GM to install suspension fix kits on all of the affected cars, but recent court filings by GM counsel says that solution is a no-go. Because all of the affected cars were made before General Motors’ bankruptcy and subsequent bailout in 2009, they were technically made by the “old” GM, the firm that became Motors Liquidation Company and has since sold all financially stable assets to General Motors. By that stretch, GM now claims that it is not responsible for any wrongdoing on the part of MLC, which would mean the class-action suit is against the wrong party. “New GM did not assume liability for old GM’s design choices,” said GM counsel Benjamin Jeffers in a court filing. While new GM agreed to warranty obligations for old GM-produced cars (which means a 2008 Impala’s drivetrain is still covered until 2013 or 100,000 miles), this problem is not classified as a warranty repair. As far as the case’s chances of winning, they may be slim: similar arguments against a class-action suit about OnStar units successfully had the suit thrown out. Source: Detroit News

Jim
I will never buy another GM product. Last year I went to the Chevrolet dealership to extend my warranty. They took my deposit and after 5 weeks of waiting for the paperwork/warranty card, I called Vehicle One but they said I wasn't in the system and would have to talk to the dealership. The dealership gave me the run around and I basically told them to stick it and refund the money. I believe they did not want to extend the warranty due to the amount of warranty work done in the past. My next vehicle will be a Toyota.
John
If Toyota or Honda made the Impala, the Government would be all over them,
John
I have own Chevy cars and trucks for four decades and currently own a 2008 Chevy Impala and Tahoe. I recently had to replace the tires on my Impala after only 36,000 miles. After this annoucement, I will never buy another GM product again.
Robert
I don't know if I should be outraged or not be surprised at all. After this all companies have to do is change name and get away with anything: What do you mean we have to recall 1 million cars?! Just change the company name!

New Car Research

our instagram

get Automobile Magazine

Subscribe to the magazine and save up to 84% off the newsstand price

subscribe

new cars

Read Related Articles

TO TOP