Ryan Thompson 5pts They should have gone with this Bertone design for their coupe. The coupe design they went with looks like its VERY hard to see out the back of.
Geezmoregeez 5pts I again read your comments as if I was reading my own column.About this elegant design, heritage cues that I would keep are some suggestion of the cat ears in the talilights that would un-buick the looks of the rear facia, the rounded C pillar from some of the 50s and 60s models and just maybe, a subtle shaping of the side marker lamp into a prowling cat... Otherwise, I agree about the proportions and point #5. A X-type with this looks would really make an interresting, different choice for the 3 series/A4-A5/C class shopper.
johncarync 5pts I used to think Robert Cumberford could read my mind and put into words things I didn't know how to articulate. Then I started to worry that I lacked any eye for design and I was just blindly agreeing with everything he wrote. Apparently I wasn't just bowing to his expertise because I am happy to report that I completely disagree with Cumberford's design analysis on the B99. Although Bertone's car is a nice homage to the old XJ, Jaguar has taken a new design tack and should not look back to the past. And I thought the panel in #17 was justifiable as mimicking the front of the car--it almost looks the same coming and going (except the taillights are red instead of white like the headlights).
kjtvc 5pts Re the Bertone Jaguar, had they presented it ten years ago, it would've been an outstanding evolutionary step in Jaguar design. Unfortunately, that opportunity passed. Ian Callum took a revolutionary step with Jaguar's new cars; their look is a complete departure from its past. Returning to the Bertone B99 would be a step backward, not forward. Too bad. It's a sharp car.