First Drive: 2013 Honda Civic

It isn’t too often that a car company admits to having whiffed a redesign, but that’s what Honda has done with the Civic. When the all-new, 2012 model made its debut, Honda was stung by the reception its new baby received, and soon promised a quick fix -- that would arrive for the very next model year. Honda would take a do-over, if you will.

So here we have the Civic’s mid-cycle update, arriving not at the usual three-year mark, but after only a year and a half. The changes include exterior styling, interior materials, chassis tuning, and standard equipment.

What, me worry?

With the 2012 redesign, it was as if Honda had become complacent. The Civic was a perennial bestseller, so why mess with success? Both mechanically and design-wise, the new car seemed barely changed. Unfortunately for Honda, the new Civic arrived into a U.S. small-car market that is in the midst of the most upheaval in decades. Small is no longer synonymous with cheap. The sophistication of compacts has soared, along with their equipment levels. The 2013 redo acknowledges that reality. We recently had an opportunity to take a quick spin in a 2013 EX sedan.

Jane is less plain

The minute the new Civic pulled up, it was immediately different-looking -- more Accord-like. A redesigned front and rear, and new wheels, move the Civic a bit along the continuum from plain to fancy. The front bumper no longer presents a monolithic plastic face to the world, but now features an inset section dressed up with a chrome bar. The new grille is where the Accord resemblance comes in; it looks more expensive, and there’s even a new hood with creases pressed into the sheetmetal. The rear of the car is similarly dressed up, with a more intricate rear bumper, a new trunk lid, and new taillights accented with a full-width chrome strip that emphasizes the car’s width.

The interior is less dour, thanks mostly to new materials. The Civic’s two-tiered dash remains, but the upper section is now black (rather than gray), and is covered in a soft-touch material that extends onto the upper door panels. This section is also re-grained and gets (somewhat unconvincing) faux stitching. The main part of the dash used to be a sea of gray plastic but now is trimmed out in a dark, brushed-metal-looking trim. The air vents, some switches, and the upholstery have all been tweaked for a less bargain-bin appearance. None of the changes are major but the sum total is a much more pleasant-looking interior that puts the Civic back up on par with the other offerings in this class.

Mechanical ministrations

The Civic was also criticized for losing the fun-to-drive quality that had long characterized even mass-market Hondas. The 2013 version goes some ways toward addressing that. After softening the suspension with the 2012 model, Honda has firmed it up again for 2013. The actual percentages vary from 3 percent to 37 percent among the different components -- springs, bushings, anti-roll bars -- and they affect both the front and the rear. That’s significant, and the new car does indeed feel fairly well tied down, and yet it’s not punishing over bumps. Honda also pulled a reverse with the steering, quickening the ratio after slowing it previously. The difference, though, is only 7 percent, and that’s not really enough to make much of an impression. The system remains electrically assisted -- over-assisted, at least from an enthusiast’s standpoint. Structural reinforcements, primarily in the front end, are designed to ensure that the Civic achieves a “good” rating in the difficult new IIHS slight-offset barrier crash test.

The Civic powertrains are untouched. The mainstay engine is a 1.8-liter and the automatic is only a five-speed. With 140 hp and 128 pound-feet of torque, acceleration is leisurely, even by compact sedan standards; fuel economy (28 mpg city, 39 mpg highway, with the automatic) is unchanged. Although the engine is unchanged, Honda has gone to greater lengths to isolate the driver from it (and from other sources of noise), with increased sound deadening and acoustic glass for the front doors and the windshield.

DX departs

The stripper DX is gone, and with it goes the skinflint’s ability to buy a Civic with crank windows and no air conditioning. With the DX no longer in the picture, all Civics have a five-inch screen to the right of the digital speedometer, and Honda is making better use of it by adding a standard rearview camera to all models. Also newly standard across the board are Bluetooth, Honda Link with text-to-speech capability, Pandora internet radio, and a sliding center armrest. The Hybrid additionally gets forward collision warning and lane departure warning at no cost.

Money matters

With the departure of the price-leader DX, Civic starting prices rise from $15,606 (for the 2012 DX coupe) to $17,965 (for the 2013 LX coupe). The LX sedan is $18,165. But on a model-to-model comparison, all 2013 Civics are only $160 more than their 2012 equivalent. Considering the addition of the backup camera alone, that makes the 2013 Civic a better value. And it’s a better value that no longer feels cheap.

2013 Honda Civic
On sale:
Now (LX and EX sedans)
Base price: $20,815 (EX sedan)

Engine: 1.8-liter I-4
Power: 140 hp @ 6500 rpm
Torque: 128 lb-ft @ 4300 rpm

Transmission: 5-speed automatic

Drive: Front-wheel

Fuel mileage: 28/39 mpg (city/highway)

jlshelby68
I did own a 2012 Civic LX Sedan, but now own a 2013 Civic LX Coupe.  I will say, other than the chassis difference, you can really tell the suspension has firmed up.  The same back roads that I used to whip around the corners with in my 2012 have now been revitalized and have become more fun.  They should have produced this version first as many of you wouyld probably agree.
Jose Cordova
Honda seems to be "putting out fires", fixing things, having large scale recalls on several generations of cars, and playing catch up. Is that what an industry leader should be doing? They need to make some big changes.
nrborod
The sliding center armrest is...back!!--one of the things I really liked in my 2010 Civic and decried for it's absence in the 2012! Now, if the NVH thing is improved enough along with the other tweaks, I'm in business.
TheClassicCarFactory
If your article said " Introducing the new 1990 Honda Civic " - I would have believed you. It's not that the design is terrible - it's that there IS no design!
SFMike
As a Zipcar member, I have had the opportunity to drive many makes of car. I am disappointed with the Civic's ride quality.  The car feels too light and the tires transmit the smallest texture of the road to the cabin.  The Nissan Sentra has a more plush ride and you sit higher than the Civic. I dont like the segmented window on the passenger and driver window. Seems like an afterthought.  They need a whole new exterior and interior makeover. I would but a Nissan Sentra over a Civic at this time.
kelego@yahoo.com
Classy looking car. Everything from Hyundai and Kia look as if they were spawned from Mothra and Corolla as always looks dumb and stupid. The Civic even before its redu was and is a better car and a better looking car. The only sane choice among its peers. Fords are just Mazdas so who cares.
TD-40
Ugly. It looks almost identical to the previous Civic that was rejected by the market. People will buy it BECAUSE IT'S A HONDA, but there are so many better options out there.
danwat1234
DARN! This sucks. No powertrain changes! I was hoping for Honda's "Earth Dreams" power train! Finally Direct Injection with dual mode engines that can act as regular OTTO cycle when you want power and Atkinson cycle when you want hybrid like MPG out of a regular engine! CVT transmission.But NO, Honda decided to do an 'emergency refresh', yet the changes are not worth it. Style changes, suspension tweaks, safety technology and body structure improvement are all great but that doesn't translate to real world value all that much.You'd be smart to wait for the 2014 year of the Civic. That is when they new powertrains will come out (hopefully).
leejsearles@gmail.com
That dash still looks like a mess.
Steve Miller
Consumer Reports were very critical about the`2012 Civic's brakes. Does the 2013 Civic fix the problem?
DERRECK
the civic use to be the car everyone had to chase not any more, Honda has got away from what they did best and its going to be a long travel back to greatness...ooh by the way I though it was a TOYOTA from the back wrong move......
trant.roger
Well, it's about time. I have always liked the Civic, but your last year review was rough and this year you have given the Civic hope.
JYH
@SFMike SFMike for those of us who drive in winter climates - if i go from driving over dry pavement to driving on ice, I want the car/tires to transmit the different road textures to the cabin. How else am I supposed to know that the car can lose traction?
bigredmatt1011@gmail.com
The new Nissan Sentra might be the worst car made.  The 2012 Civic screams high quality over the new Sentra.  The Sentra also still gets by with a beam axle in the back and it has less power without a real gas mileage advantage.
jlshelby68
@leejsearles@gmail.com Actually, the 2013 dash is quite a bit more pleasing to me than my 2012.  The day I bought my 2012 the dash glow reflected off my windshield and I had to turn it down.  With the improvement in the dash I'd hazard to say the glare from the dashboard lights is less of an issue in the 2013.
bigredmatt1011@gmail.com
YES
jlshelby68
@bigredmatt1011@gmail.com In my 2012 the brakes felt a little "spongey" and lacluster, while my 2013 feels more firm and more reactive to invasive maneuvering and braking.

New Car Research

our instagram

get Automobile Magazine

Subscribe to the magazine and save up to 84% off the newsstand price

subscribe

new cars

Read Related Articles

TO TOP